True Haunting Image
CLICK HERE ::: https://shoxet.com/2tlPOV
Regardless, Loab sparked some lengthy ethical conversations around visual aesthetics, art and technology. Supercomposite still has more images that she will continue to share, and she encourages Twitter users to check back in for their daily dose of Loab.
What if you want the "ghost image" to be something other than a copy of the element Well, there's event.dataTransfer.setDragImage(), which tells us that "if the node is an HTML img element, an HTML canvas element or a XUL image element, the image data is used. Otherwise, image should be a visible node and the drag image will be created from this." So, you can set an image perfectly happily:
But I don't want that, you cry. I want the element I'm drawing to stay green, but the ghost image to be red. Hey, you think, I've got a plan: I'll dynamically create an element inside dragstart, and use that!
That doesn't work. This is because, as the spec says, "Otherwise, image should be a visible node and the drag image will be created from this." Gotta be a visible node, and a node created but not in the document isn't visible. So, if we drop that node into the document, then we can use it as a drag image:
And now you've tried those, and none of them work; that is, you get no drag image. Because the thing you're trying to set as the drag image isn't visible*. To prove this point, here's an element where we position the thing to copy for the drag image half off the screen and half on:
So, we need a way to have an element to copy for the drag image, and for that element to be visible as far as the browser is concerned, but for it to be invisible as far as the user is concerned. How is this inconsistent miracle to be achieved
When The Conjuring was released in 2013, it was met with critical acclaim. Critics everywhere praised it for its all-too-realistic portrayal of the demonic haunting of an innocent family in Rhode Island.
Most viewers assumed that the movie was nothing but the wild imaginings of director James Wan. However, the true story of The Conjuring is actually rooted in a horrifying true experience of Ed and Lorraine Warren.
In 1952, Ed and Lorraine founded the New England Society for Psychic Research, the oldest ghost hunting group in New England. They quickly gained notoriety as respected paranormal investigators after their initial investigation of the Amityville hauntings.
The officer who arrived reported witnessing a chair rise up and move across the floor on its own. Reporters from the Daily Mirror, who were also called in to report on the Enfield haunting experienced them for themselves too.
Then, one day, the iron fireplace in an upstairs bedroom was ripped out of the wall. After that, paranormal investigators from all around the world showed up, claiming to be able to contact spirits, and wanting to know more about the Enfield haunting.
This is where the story differs from the movie as there was no exorcism-like practice from the Warrens. In 1979, two years after they began, the hauntings abruptly stopped, though the family maintains they did nothing to stop them.
The Enfield poltergeist was a claim of supernatural activity at 284 Green Street, a council house in Brimsdown, Enfield, London, England, United Kingdom, between 1977 and 1979. The alleged poltergeist activity centred around sisters Janet (11) and Margaret Hodgson (13).[1] Some members of the Society for Psychical Research (SPR), such as inventor Maurice Grosse and writer Guy Lyon Playfair, believed the haunting to be genuine, while others such as Anita Gregory and John Beloff were "unconvinced" and found evidence the girls had faked incidents for the benefit of journalists. Members of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), including stage magicians such as Milbourne Christopher and Joe Nickell, criticized paranormal investigators for being credulous whilst also identifying elements of the case as being indicative of a hoax.[2][3][4]
Society for Psychical R
https://www.profeconcha.com/group/plaquetarios/discussion/78c95586-4e89-472f-b0b4-29cadbc7128a